Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Monday, October 29, 2007
Monday Homework
Here are some of the class notes:
Calling on students for chance cards.
Simple Random Sample:
Use the Random Integer command on my calculator to randomly pick who to call on.
OR:
Put everyone's name in a hat and draw 5 names.
Stratified Random Sample:
I might stratify by class grades. Divide the class into five groups
(A, B, C, D, F) and randomly pick some students to participate from
each group. I think students with high grades are more likely to
participate and vice versa, so this will give me a good
representation.
Cluster sample:
Randomly pick one of the 8 table groups and call on everyone in that group.
Systematic Random Sample:
Use the roll sheet and pick every 5th person.
OR:
Pick every 3rd person as you arrive to class.
Population: Rancho Students
Question: Is RCHS a quality school?
Possible Strata?
Stratifying by GPA:
I would divide the student body into 3 groups: high, med and low GPA.
I would then randomly choose some students to survey from each group.
I think that each of these groups will have very different opinions
about RCHS and I want to make sure that each group is represented.
Friday, October 26, 2007
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Test tomorrow!
Study chapters 7 through 10 and normal problems
Study your worksheet from Chapter 10
Study your old regression test on temp/crawling
Study Ch. 9 #1
Study extrapolation, outliers and influential points and the standard
deviation of the residuals
Chapter 10 #1 and 2
Monday, October 22, 2007
Friday, October 19, 2007
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Starting Chapter 10
1979—226,260
1980—907,075
1981—2,826,095
Year vs. acres devastated by the gypsy moth.
Predict for 1982, please!
Also, MC packet #6
Monday, October 15, 2007
Influential?
Ch. 9 #11-16
Article #4 due Friday--just write a half-page summary
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Review Answers
17c) First take the squareroot of 0.924. I forget exactly what this is, but it is 0.9something. This tells us there is a strong, positive, linear relationship between tar and nicotine.
17d) For every 1 more mg of tar, we predict about 0.065 more mg of nicotine.
17e) Even with no tar, we still predict about 0.154 mg of nicotine.
1d) 92.3% of the variation in age can be explained by the regression on age.
1f) She is shorter than predicted, for her age.
1g) Wait until next week.
See you in the morning!
Now go to bed! :o)
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Practice Test
Add to #10 the interpretation of the y-intercept
Parts of this assignment will graded tomorrow
and this grade will be part of your test grade.
Monday, October 08, 2007
Friday, October 05, 2007
Thursdays HW
#25ef, 29c
#30: slope, y-intercept, r, R2, and prediction for 2002
Article #3!!!
No homework for Friday